Connecticut Sexual Harassment laws & HR compliance analysis

Connecticut Sexual Harassment: What you need to know

The Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (CFEPA) prohibits sexual harassment of employees and interns (CT Gen. Stat. Sec. 46a-60). The Act applies to employers of three or more persons. However, all employers, regardless of size, are prohibited from discrimination or harassment of unpaid interns.
For a Limited Time receive a FREE HR Report on the "Critical HR Recordkeeping”.  This exclusive special report covers hiring records, employment relationships, termination records, litigation issues, electronic information issues, tips for better recordkeeping, and a list of legal requirements.  Download Now
Sexual harassment. Sexual harassment means any unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors, any conduct of a sexual nature when submission to the conduct is made as a term or condition of an individual's employment or as a basis of employment decisions affecting the individual, or the conduct creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment (CT Admin. Code Sec. 46a-54-200 et seq.).
Defenses. Under a standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court, employers generally can avoid liability for a hostile work environment by asserting an affirmative defense. The employer must prove two necessary elements:
(1) That it exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any harassing behavior; and
(2) That the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to otherwise avoid harm.
However, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that an employer is not entitled to the affirmative defense simply because its antiharassment policy provides alternative complaint channels that the employee did not use (Gorzynski v. JetBlue Airways Corp., 596 F. 3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010)). The employee in this case alleged that she was sexually harassed by her supervisor and that she complained to him about the harassment. The employer argued that it was entitled to the affirmative defense because its antiharassment policy ...

Read more about Sexual Harassment